Sunday, April 08, 2007
NY Times article is online
Here it is.
And while one can always nit-pick about this description or that comparison, I have to say that the brief BlogHer mention (on page 2 of the article) is OK.
Side note: Does it make me a bad marketing person that I'm actually hoping that the mention is small enough that they won't publish our picture? I think it really does. Or at least a selfish marketing person. Anyway, I guess we won't know that until we pick up a hard copy.
And while one can always nit-pick about this description or that comparison, I have to say that the brief BlogHer mention (on page 2 of the article) is OK.
Side note: Does it make me a bad marketing person that I'm actually hoping that the mention is small enough that they won't publish our picture? I think it really does. Or at least a selfish marketing person. Anyway, I guess we won't know that until we pick up a hard copy.
// posted by ElisaC @ 8:52 PM 
Comments:
<< Home
How could the NY Times resist augmenting the article with a picture of three hot chicks? ;)
# posted by 
: 4/10/2007 9:57 AM
: 4/10/2007 9:57 AM
One of our male colleagues asked if it was wrong that he saw the picture and thought we were a hot grrrls rock band.
I told him it was very very wrong ;)
Post a Comment
I told him it was very very wrong ;)
<< Home
